“If you take good kids out of bad schools, bad schools get worse”
– my dad, a long time ago.
This is an idea I grew up believing to be absolutely true. Purely because my dad said it when I was really young, and as far as I was concerned what he said was gospel. Especially when it came to education.
I should give you some context. I grew up in Barry, an industrial town on the coast of South Wales. Many of you may know it from the TV show, Gavin and Stacey. For those of you who have no idea what I’m talking about – number 1, watch the program – it’s brilliant, and number 2, the purpose of this blog, here’s the facts: Barry is a seaside town with a population of about 50,500 people. An old port, much of Barry’s industrial history is in export and manufacturing. It’s a standard rapidly grown late-Victorian/ Edwardian port.
People always joked about being from Barry. There was this weird, in-jest-but-kind-of-serious judgement about our town, our home. In fact, even my mum (who we’ve always branded a bit of a snob despite coming from a national coalboard house in the valleys) would tell people we lived in ‘Barry, worst luck’ to the point where I actually thought this was its name. As a kid if someone asked where I was from I would proudly state ‘Barry Worst Luck’ with absolutely no concept of what I was saying or why all of the adults were laughing at me and cooing over my cuteness. Thanks for that Mum. In my dad’s geography classroom he had 4 clocks on the wall: New York, Tokyo, Paris, Barry, because the students at his school would make fun about where he lived. Even now, teaching in Cardiff, students make fun of teachers from Barry. I honestly have no idea why but I’m aware that the town has a poor reputation. Perhaps it’s because there are areas of Barry suffering huge deprivation. Perhaps because people are judgemental and fear things they don’t understand. Who knows?
The town has four schools. When I was entering secondary school these were Barry Boys, a single sex comprehensive for boys; Bryn Hafren, the same for girls; Bro Morgannwg, a Welsh speaking school, and St. Richard Gwyn, a faith school for those who attended Catholic primaries. As neither a Welsh speaker nor a Catholic, the natural progression for my education was the local comprehensive for girls, Bryn Hafren.
Now, I should add that at the time my dad taught in a comprehensive in a more affluent area of Cardiff whose catchment made it a more desirable option for parents – a ‘better’ school, a ‘good’ school. I desperately wanted to go there. I’d had a rough time towards the end of primary. I was never cool or popular, despite my best efforts and the fact that was was clever and tried hard at school did not bode well for my future as one of the ‘It’ crowd. I wanted out. I was a ‘good’ kid, I wanted to go to a ‘good’ school – damn it!
Now, his response (the quote at the beginning of this post) perhaps informed my perceptions and ideas surrounding the education system and it is that I am questioning now: is it right and just that some parents can choose where their children go to or should children just go to their local comp? Should parents of ‘good kids’ be allowed to move postcodes, attend church, manipulate the system in some way so that their child can get in to the best state school available? Or is it this very notion that perpetuates the problem of deprivation and polarises the quality of our children’s education, and in turn their future success, wealth, happiness? If we take good kids from supportive homes with parents who are interested and aware enough to want to avoid certain schools, out of their local comp, are we being socially irresponsible or are we just being good parents?
I did well at school. I came away from Bryn Hafren, a perceived ‘bad’ school, with 13 GCSEs and went on to achieve 4 A Levels at college. I didn’t particularly enjoy my time there but like I said, I was geeky. I was also overweight and a little spotty so to be honest I’m not sure I’d have had the easiest ride no matter where I went; I don’t blame the school for that. I interviewed at Oxford (no, I didn’t get in) and went on to achieve a 2:1 at Exeter University, followed by a PGCE through Teach First at Bristol Uni. I’m currently studying my masters. In my last essay I was awarded 88/100. I do not tell you this to brag, I am merely laying down the facts. The hard evidence, if you like, that my dad’s socially responsible sacrifice: my education, in fact was not a sacrifice at all. My education was good despite the ‘imperfections’ of the place in which I was educated. But then I was a bright kid who lived in a home where I was read to and talked with. A place where I felt safe, in which I was nurtured and exposed to history and geography and politics. My parents spoke to me about things that mattered, and my opinions were valued despite me being a child. In some ways, I suppose, I was an asset to the classrooms at my school because I could participate in meaningful discussions about current affairs. My experience was punctuated by literature, ethics, politics, and yet I still understood that there were people my age who didn’t have access to the information I did. The combination made me who I am, it informed my perceptions and beliefs about the world in which I live. It enabled, and continues to enable, me to empathise with both sides of the coin. In some ways I was a ‘sacrificial lamb’, a ‘good kid’ in a ‘bad’ school. I was someone whose parents knew that the school I was attending was not the best according to Estyn, who knew that potentially I could do better if I went somewhere else, but who didn’t care. Because they also knew that I would be absolutely bloody fine. And I was.
So I suppose my question is: is it right that some people have the ability to move houses and change their postcode so their children can go to the ‘better’ school; is it ok that some can even afford to pay for their children to attend schools with smaller class sizes and better facilities? Or is it our social responsibility to allow our children to mix, combine and therefore, disperse wealth, knowledge, awareness, intelligence, perspective?
If there was no elitism, no ability to choose, or if when given that choice we just sent them to our local comp would we change the polarisation of education and in turn, challenge the differences in class and wealth? Do we all have a social responsibility to our society, or is it understandable that parents want the absolute best for their kids? Should those of us who understand and empathise with the state of our nation ‘sacrifice’ our lambs for the good of those around us, to improve our schools and therefore, our communities? I’m yet to have children and so find it hard to put myself in this impossible position. I wonder what I would do.
Food for thought,
Miss R x